Showing posts with label Spot Delivery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Spot Delivery. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 28, 2011

Dealer Practices to be Scrutinized by the FTC and CFPB

“Bottom-Feeders” to Be the First Scrutinized...

By: Thomas Hudson


When you are a lawyer, it seems that all your friends insist on telling you every lawyer joke they hear. One of my favorite recent ones: “What’s the difference between a lawyer and a carp?” The answer, after my obligatory “I give up” was, “One’s a scum-sucking bottom-feeder, and the other one’s just a fish.”

I immediately thought of that one when I read that Federal Trade Commission Chairman Jon Leibowitz, in a speech to the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, used the term “bottom-feeder” in describing the FTC’s agenda for the coming year in light of the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), with which the FTC will share enforcement authority over financial services companies.


Read the rest of this excellent article here: http://www.autodealermonthly.com/79/4078/ARTICLE/Dealer-Practices-to-be-Scrutinized-by-the-FTC-and-CFPB.aspx



Next Post: http://autofinanceinsider.blogspot.com/2011/05/compare-spending-habits-with-your-peers.html


Back to the Auto Finance Insider blog homepage:

Sunday, January 4, 2009

The Dangers That a Spot Delivery Brings to a Dealership

The following article does a good job of highlighting the dangers and fraud inherent in the misuse of conditional, or "spot" deliveries.

Spot deliveries: Slippery slope for dealers

By April Wortham, from Automotive News.


Bill Heard Enterprises Inc.'s Chevrolet empire was crumbling.



Rising fuel prices were gutting the dealer group's high-volume sales of SUVs and pickups.

As showroom traffic at Heard dealerships fell, so did the amount of customers getting into loans, says a former manager at one of the group's two Las Vegas-area stores.

The dealership began targeting what he calls the "credit-challenged customer."

It delivered vehicles to customers on the spot, sometimes at lower interest rates than those for which the customer was likely to qualify.

Handing over the keys before completing the financing is a sales tactic known as spot delivery.

It's a tempting tactic to move the metal in tough times, but as Heard Enterprises learned, it is a risky practice for dealers.

In the last days of the Las Vegas store, the bank rejected a submitted deal about 20 to 30 percent of the time. Some buyers had to return their vehicles.

Others had to re-sign with additional cash down or a higher interest rate. And some were switched into less expensive vehicles that met the bank's lending criteria.

"Those criteria seemed to be ignored a great deal of the time as the pressure was put on the managers to put vehicles on the street," says the manager, who asked not to be identified because he is searching for a new job.

"I think the philosophy was to throw enough stuff against the wall hoping some of it would stick.

As it got closer to the end, less deals were getting bought by the banks."

In September, Heard Enterprises filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, closing all 14 of its Chevrolet dealerships. While the case is extreme, it serves as a warning to dealers who routinely practice spot delivery.

Spot delivery is inherently risky

Done wrong, it can leave a dealer exposed to allegations of predatory lending and to the risk that comes with having millions of dollars in unfinanced inventory roaming the streets.

Yet spot deliveries are tempting for dealers who are trying to sell a car before the customer goes to a rival dealership. That's especially true now, as the number of Americans with tarnished credit grows and one sale can keep a dealership afloat.

There is no way to know for sure how many dealers use spot delivery, but Better Business Bureaus and attorney general offices in several states have fielded consumer complaints about the practice.

"Although the number of dealers spotting cars today has slightly decreased because of tighter lending practices, it is still a necessary evil in the subprime market for the long term," says Raul Vazquez, a dealer consultant and CEO of direct marketing agency Focus Inc.

Vazquez says it takes longer to get loans approved and funded for subprime customers. Yet most customers aren't willing to wait. Rather than watch a customer walk away, most dealers will hand over the keys right then and there, he says.

Dealers who offer spot delivery, he says, must be certain the terms of the sale will stick. "You have to know the lender guidelines. You have to have a sales manager who's watching the deals," Vazquez says. "There are too many guys out there that say, 'Let me put the car out there and maybe I'll get them into a loan.' You just can't do that, because it's too risky for the dealership."

Know the law

Several states regulate spot deliveries, and the rules can vary widely.

Contact your state attorney general's office or department of motor vehicles for details.

Don't leave decisions about when and how to spot-deliver vehicles to a sales manager or F&I manager.

Have a policy in place, and make sure all employees follow it.

Set limits. Auto loans can be approved in 10 days. Anything more than 30 days is asking for trouble. (30 days is freakin' crazy - AFI)

Communicate

Explain to customers that the vehicle purchase isn't final until financing is secured (use a bailment).

Just because they have the keys doesn't mean they own the car.

Put it in writing

Have the customer sign a form that clearly states what spot delivery means. The dealer and the customer also should sign a form stating that if financing cannot be secured the customer is under no obligation to sign another contract.

Deal with it

If a problem arises, tackle it immediately. Don't wait until the customer has gone to the attorney general or a lawyer.

Growing risk

The risk is growing. Almost every lender has tightened its guidelines, especially for subprime loans. Others have abandoned the subprime loan business. That leaves dealers competing for a shrinking pool of money.

On Oct. 28, Myers & Fuller P.A., a Tallahassee, Fla. law firm that specializes in dealer issues, sent a letter to its clients warning them against offering spot deliveries. Doing so, the letter states, could cause them to be considered in breach of contract with their floorplan lender, a situation known as "out of trust."

In essence, once a car leaves the lot, the dealer must repay his source of wholesale financing.

"It is important to understand what the phrase 'out of trust' means when used by a floorplan lender," the letter states. "It may mean that the lender considers any vehicle not in physical inventory on the dealership premises is deemed 'sold' and the lender demands immediate payment (yea...)

"This can occur with dealers who make many sales through spot deliveries and the lender changes the definition of 'sale' in midstream."

GMAC Financial Services LLC, Heard Enterprises' main financing company, denies that it is changing the definitions or rules.

When GMAC provides floorplan financing, the dealer has a window from the time a vehicle leaves the lot until payment is due, says spokesman Mike Stoller.

That window varies from dealer to dealer, but all dealers know exactly what their window is, he says.

It's not a new policy, and the window hasn't suddenly become smaller. But GMAC is "watching its risks" more closely now, Stoller adds.

In other words, dealers who might have gone unnoticed with sloppy spot deliveries in the past are under the microscope now, and GMAC won't hesitate to label them as out of trust.

'Yo-yo financing'

In fact, Stoller says, he wonders why any dealers would risk spot delivering now, unless they were sure that they could get financing.

"We're not outlawing spot delivery. They can do what they need to do to get by," he says. "But it just doesn't strike me as being very wise in this environment."

The current lending climate has exacerbated problems with spot delivery that until now were largely considered consumer issues.

Officials in state attorney general offices tell of dealers calling customers days, weeks, even months later to say that financing fell through.

The customer is usually given a choice: Renegotiate the loan, almost always at less favorable terms, or return the vehicle and pay for any damage or mileage incurred. In many cases the dealership already has sold the customer's trade-in vehicle, leaving the customer with little choice but to sign the new terms.

John van Alst, a lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center in Boston, says that in the cases he has seen, the dealer knew as the customer drove away that financing was unlikely to be approved.

In those cases, he says, the dealer intentionally misled the consumer with the intention of bringing the consumer back later in a disadvantaged position. It's why van Alst and other critics have another name for spot delivery: "yo-yo financing."

"They've already shown their friends and family that they've gotten a new car. And then the dealer brings them back in and forces them to agree to new and worse terms," he says, such as a larger down payment.

Differing opinions

Spot delivery is a necessary selling tool, says Michael Charapp, a Washington dealer lawyer and president of the National Association of Dealer Counsel. Something goes wrong only rarely, he says. Even then, it's usually because the customer made a mistake or lied on the credit application, not because the dealer sought to deceive.

In fact, the loan process is becoming more precise, not less, he says. Services such as DealerTrack and RouteOne allow dealers to submit digital credit applications to a network of lenders and learn almost instantly if a loan will go through.

Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety in suburban Los Angeles, counters that those instant loan rulings are proof that the vast majority of yo-yo transactions are deliberate.

When dealers had to wait until the bank opened on Monday to fax over a stack of weekend sales contracts, there might have been an excuse, says Shahan. Not now. She says spot delivery is a "huge issue" that hurts dealers as much as consumers.

"It's like the industry is eating its young," she says. Consumers end up in cars they can't afford and take on more debt than they can handle. "People end up being so upside down that you drive them away from the market."

Weak waivers

Keith Whann, a dealer lawyer and former Ohio assistant attorney general, recommends dealers have customers sign what he calls an "acknowledgement of voluntary re-sign." (Bailment)

The form states that the customer understands the deal isn't final and that if financing can't be secured at the agreed-upon terms the buyer is under no obligation to re-sign the contract or purchase the vehicle.

Some dealers are deciding not to chance it. Emanuel Jones, a Georgia dealer who is buying Heard Enterprises' flagship Columbus store, says spot deliveries are part of the sales process. Banks aren't open seven days a week, but his Ford and Toyota stores are.

"However, when the credit market tightens," Jones says, "and you're still doing a lot of spot deliveries, you're going to run into a lot of problems. In my store we had to curtail a lot of spot deliveries for customers we thought were marginal."

Chrissie Thompson contributed to this report

BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com

Saturday, March 22, 2008

Top Compliance Concerns for 2008

Top Compliance Concerns for 2008
by : Gil Van Over

There are risks, and there are risks. If you are late to an important appointment, meeting or date, you balance the risk of exceeding the speed limit and making the meeting on time versus the risk of obeying the law and potentially losing face if you are late.

If you are trying to reduce your belt size, you balance the risk of adding pounds versus the pleasure of a Reuben sandwich with cottage fries at lunch.

If you are a movie star or a recording artist, you run the risk of losing your audience when you use your star status to forward an unpopular opinion or belief or religion.

A dealership faces risk every day in every part of the business. The smart dealers understand that they must have the information available to understand how to manage these risks. Here is some information…

Higher risks

There are innumerable risks in a dealership’s sales and F&I processes. Some are pretty low risks, while others are a relatively higher risk. Here is my list of the higher risk areas a dealership faces in 2008:

• Identity theft
• Packing payments
• Forging signatures
• Falsifying income
• Power booking
• Straw purchases
• Sub-prime acquisition fees
• Forms execution
• Adverse action notification
• Rebate administration

One at a time:

Identity theft – The bad guys are out there and they ain’t going away. Many people are focused on the meth heads that use ID theft as a way to fuel their habit. However, many of the articles flowing through the Internet now uncover the ID thieves as employees at dealerships and banks. Make sure that you have a solid Safeguards program in place, including periodic audits and training. Keep a vigilant eye on those employees that have access to consumer’s non-public, personal information. Finally, ramp up your organization to embrace the Red Flags Rule requirements. You should have already started to develop and implement the program with a drop dead date of November 1.


Packing payments
– This potentially deceptive practice is specifically illegal in California and other states are looking to pass similar statutes. The dark side opines that a consumer has the right to know the right payment amount for the item being negotiated at any point in the negotiations. The judges and juries tend to agree with this notion. With the number of desking systems now available to dealerships, payment packing should become as ancient as 8-track technology, but it still makes occasional appearances. You should implement a process that prohibits payment packing, whether you use a desking system or a sharpie.

Forging signatures – Logic dictates that this criminal offense should not be on this list because it should not even be a course of action any reasonable person would take. Think again. Perhaps out of laziness, perhaps out of oversight, perhaps out of brazenness, forgeries are happening every day at dealerships. Most of the time it is not on a contract or an enrollment form. Most of the time it is on a menu or an odometer statement or a rebate form. Regardless of the document, any signature not affixed by the consumer is a forgery. You must make it a policy that forgers will be fired and follow up if you find a forgery.

Falsifying income – This is bank fraud. Let me repeat, bank fraud. If the bank or credit union catches you, they will report you to the Feds using a form called a Suspicious Activity Report. I don’t know about you, but I shudder to think that my name is associated with a suspicious report on file with the government. A few dealers have had enough SARs filed against them that the banking regulators turned the case over to the FBI, who investigated and raided and still retains the files. You can help avoid the FBI raids by diligently monitoring credit application information. Look for strikeovers on credit applications, or an inordinate amount of Social Security income as additional income. Have your IT people run a scan on your systems looking for paystub templates or Social Security award letter templates. Review a sampling of deals and compare the income in the file to the income listed in Route One, Dealer Track or CUDL transmissions.

Power booking – Bank fraud II. Like falsifying income, dealers found guilty of power booking deals will have an SAR filed against the dealer. Same scenario as above. Too many SARs and the FBI comes calling. Set up a process where a manager is required to sign and date every bookout sheet that leaves the dealership. That person is responsible to accurately represent the vehicle’s options and miles. If the manager lies to the bank, the manager is looking for a job somewhere else.

Straw purchases – Bank fraud déjà vu. Straw purchases generate SARs. Straws are also specifically against the Texas state statutes. You need to establish a policy that straws are not acceptable and enforce the policy.

Sub-prime acquisition fees – With the current focus on sub-prime lending, regulators, politicians and opportunistic plaintiff’s lawyers will put a magnifying glass on sub-prime transactions. Add to the mix that the vast majority of consumer lawsuits against dealers that I have worked on as an expert witness involve a sub-prime customer as the plaintiff. If you have a process that increases the price of a vehicle to accommodate a sub-prime acquisition fee, you are running the risk of a Truth in Lending based lawsuit. You must take the sub-prime acquisition fee as a cost of goods sold.

Forms execution – As simple as it sounds, it appears to be just as difficult in execution. The forms used to close a deal are pre-printed. The computers used to complete the forms can be programmed to properly fill in the blanks. Some dealers just don’t get it and fill them out incorrectly. The lenders continue to accept the deals instead of kicking them. Now, plaintiffs’ attorneys are using this as evidence that the dealership intended to confuse the consumer, thus committing fraud. Have your F&I manager print a sample retail and lease deal. Make sure everything is printing where it is supposed to.

Adverse action notification – This issue is likely the most confusing one that a dealer faces. Should I or shouldn’t I? Unfortunately, like those old commercials, we don’t have a hairdresser with the magic answer. Some plaintiffs’ attorneys are funding their retirement incomes on this single issue. The NADA provided direction late last year with a management guide. You should review the guide with your attorney and decide what you need to do.

Rebate administration – Some manufacturers apparently consider rebate audits as an income center. I have heard of seven-figure chargebacks at single point stores. You should consider conducting your own periodic audits to ensure that you don’t owe the factory any more money.

Gil Van Over is the president and founder of gvo3 & Associates, a national compliance consulting firm that specializes in F&I and sales compliance and training.

Link to Dealer Magazine Article


LUCKY EBAY SEARCH BOX

Click here for your favorite eBay items



Visit AutoFinanceInsider.com