Thursday, March 17, 2011
Former Automotive F&I Manager and Wife Face ID Theft Charges
The former finance manager of a General Motors dealership in Harlan, Ky., and his wife face theft and identity-theft charges in Harlan County Circuit Court this week for allegedly using customer names and personal data to obtain loans for cars he bought and resold for profit, according to the Kentucky State Police.
Paul Anthony Casolari, 42, the former finance manager at Creech Chevrolet-Buick Inc. in Harlan, and his wife, Christy Casolari, 32, both of Cumberland, Ky., have been charged with alleged thefts that took place from 2008 to 2010, police said. Harlan is in southeastern Kentucky about 15 miles from the Virginia border.
Paul Casolari obtained loans and bought cars using personal information from real customers, said Trooper Walt Meachum, a spokesman for the Kentucky State Police.
“He was getting loans using stolen identities,” Meachum said. “He would try to resell them quickly, but if he didn’t get them sold in time, he was making payments on them until he did sell them for profit.”
Christy Casolari took part in the alleged thefts with her husband, but she was not employed by the dealership, Meachum said.
Customers found out cars had been bought in their names when they checked their credit reports, Meachum said. He said police believe the alleged thefts involved “about eight” vehicles, and that multiple charges are linked to each vehicle.
Reached by phone, dealership owner Joe Creech declined to comment.
The Casolaris are scheduled to be arraigned, or formally notified in court of the charges against them, on Thursday, March 17. They were arrested Feb. 21 and freed almost immediately after posting bond, police said.
Paul Casolari faces 106 counts of forgery, plus 12 counts of identity theft, nine other theft-related charges, plus trafficking in stolen identities, according to court records. Christy Casolari faces similar charges, minus the forgery counts, court records show.
A court clerk said court records did not identify any attorneys representing the Casolaris, and the Casolaris could not be reached for comment.
AFI's take on this: It could have been A LOT WORSE. So he was using stolen identities to buy and flip vehicles. That's just the first step toward taking everything and skipping town. Maybe that was the plan anyway and they got caught before they could run.
This is just another example that identity theves will get caught, and if it happens to involve an F&I Manager - throw the book at 'em. We have to trumpet honesty and integrity in the F&I profession.
Yet another reason for F&I Managers to become AFIP Certified. Contact me at: AutoFinanceInsider@yahoo.com for contact information of a dynamic and vivacious agent who will prepare and proctor the AFIP exam for your F&I Managers.
Link to original article: from: LEX18.com (Lexington, KY)
Next Post: Rewriting the Rules of Credit
Back to the Auto Finance Insider blog homepage:
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 2 comments
Labels: AFIP Certification, Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption, Ethics, Identity Theft, Red Flags Rule
Tuesday, November 3, 2009
Former Ford Dealers Hit by Bank Fraud Charges
Dealers facing up to 30 years in prison
This isn’t your everyday bank fraud story.
Authorities charge that the former owners of a Ford dealership in upstate Wisconsin defrauded a local bank in a scheme that lasted over four years and resulted in losses of over $2 million.
According to a press release from the U.S. Attorney’s office and reports in the LaCrosse Tribune and the Chippewa Herald, the accused men who are brothers, have agreed to plead guilty to charges stemming from a fraud that court documents say cost two banks more than $2 million.
You can’t blame this one on the lousy conditions in auto retailing.
The scheme allegedly began in January 2004 and wasn’t uncovered until August 2008.
Information filed by federal prosecutors indicates that the pair falsely claimed to be buying vehicles for their inventory. But it turns out that some of the loans were for vehicles the brothers never bought. In other instances, the pair were simply out of trust by failing to report to the banks that vehicles had been sold.
The fraud resulted in a $1,767,353 loss for Farmers and Merchants Bank and a $296,861 loss for First Bank.
The banks discovered the fraud in August 2008 and reported the matter to federal authorities in August 2008. The dealership is still operating but is under new ownership.
The former dealers each face a maximum penalty of 30 years in prison plus restitution.
A government spokesperson said that some funds have been repaid by selling personal property.
Wow.
BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 1 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption, Ethics
Saturday, February 21, 2009
Tempting Times Can Tempt the Best
by : Gil Van Over

AFI - I wish my picture looked this good.
Temptations abound.
Should I continue with my heart healthy diet and order the salad for dinner or go ahead and splurge just once (again) for a Reuben sandwich with fries?
Should I get another half hour of sleep before heading out to a dealership or get up and spend 30 minutes on the treadmill?
Should I write my article on the plane or expand my mind with the diabolical Sudoku puzzle?
Temptations play with our minds and our decision-making process. Temptations will sometimes lead us to do something we know isn’t right, but succumb anyway.
Examples:
Here are some examples of temptations leading employees or consumers astray:
An office employee at a west coast dealership was arrested and charged with felony embezzlement. According to published reports, she was in some personal distress due to health issues and her husband’s failed trucking business.
The United States Treasury Department is warning dealers that people are using fraudulent financial documents intended to resemble Treasury related instruments to purchase vehicles. These are identified as “personal promissory notes” or “private offset bonds.”
There have also been numerous stories over the last few months about sales or F&I employees stepping over the bank fraud line. The Feds are proclaiming that they are stepping up efforts to ferret out bank fraud.
As tempting times can tempt the best, dealerships should realize that even the most trusted employee, or the most unassuming consumer, could find themselves in desperate financial troubles. Here are some tips to help prevent this from happening at your dealership.
Employee theft:
The office employee who allegedly embezzled the money had the responsibility to open the mail, receive the bank statement, reconcile the bank statement and make the daily bank deposit. She was able to write personal checks to the dealership, take the cash and cover up the bounced checks when the bank statements showed up.
This dealership might have avoided the embezzlement if it had separated these various duties. The person who opens the mail cannot also be responsible for reconciling the bank statement. The person who makes the daily deposit cannot also reconcile the bank statement.
Many internal thefts are uncovered by other employees who see something that just doesn’t make sense and brings the suspicious transaction to a manager’s attention. Use employees to audit and review others’ work.
For example, have someone other than the department manager periodically conduct a physical inventory audit. Someone other than the accounts payable clerk should occasionally review all the checks written over a two-week period of time. Someone other than the rebate clerk should from time to time reconcile the rebates applied for and rebates credited.
Having independent audits conducted by other employees in the dealership can uncover theft and act as a deterrent. Just alternate the areas that employees review to minimize the likelihood of collusion.
Consumer fraud:
Many of the stories I read about con artists scamming dealers involves a certain level of either greed or stupidity or both.
One story involved a young couple presenting out of state personal checks to purchase two luxury vehicles. The couple agreed to prices in excess of MSRP. The apparently greedy sales manager approved the Saturday delivery. By Monday, the checks were no good and the couple (and luxury cars) were long gone.
This story includes both greed (prices in excess of MSRP) and stupidity (young couple, out of state personal checks, weekend delivery). The sales manager overlooked the obvious red flags.
There are usually some red flags or warning signs in a consumer fraud transaction. Identify them and train your staff on how to identify them and make the appropriate delivery decision.
Bank fraud:
Unfortunately, when times get a little rough, employees may be tempted to resort to old-school fraudulent practices to sell or finance a vehicle.
The temptation is to give someone a raise on a credit application, or arrange for a straw purchase, or to increase the vehicle’s value to the lender through non-existent options or falsify the amount of the down payment.
The rationale is apparently a combination of “everyone is doing it” and “I won’t get caught.”
Since bank fraud with a federally insured institution is a federal crime, this flawed rationale could end up in jail time for the offender.
First, not everyone is doing it. Most dealers have reputable employees who don’t commit bank fraud. Second, the likelihood of getting caught is increasing every day as the Feds continue to focus on the credit crisis and understand that bank fraud constitutes a part of the problem.
To protect yourself and to minimize the likelihood of bank fraud within your four corners, institute this four-part program:
• Unequivocally declare to all employees that bank fraud is not condoned and offenders will be terminated.
• Establish a credit application submission policy that requires the consumer to complete a handwritten credit application and that information is accurately submitted to the lenders.
• Periodically audit the handwritten credit applications to the application submitted via DealerTrack, Route One and others.
• Terminate any offenders.
The same process applies to minimizing potentially deceptive practices such as payment packing, stuffing products, trading rate for product or discriminatory pricing.
Anything less may be viewed by your employees as permission to commit bank fraud in your name.
Gil Van Over is the president of gvo3 & Associates, a nationally recognized dealer compliance consulting firm. He assists dealers with F&I and sales compliance.
BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Compliance, Gil Van Over, Safeguards Rule, The Way it Should Be Done
Saturday, January 24, 2009
Nissan Dealership in Orange County Raided
District Attorney investigators are looking into accusations of identity theft. Thousands may be at risk, prosecutors say.
By: KIMBERLY EDDS
First published in The Orange County Register
Link to source article: Check out the video of the raid.
A Nissan dealership here was raided Monday by dozens of investigators from Orange County District Attorney's Office and the Orange police department as part of a months-long investigation in complaints of identity theft by the dealership.
The investigation into Douglas Nissan at 1140 W. Katella Avenue is still in its infancy, officials said at a press conference in front of the dealership, but there may have been thousands of fraudulent loans processed with the stolen identities of thousands of unsuspecting people in the scam. The vast majority of victims were Hispanic, prosecutors said.
GENERAL MANAGER: : Booking photo of Frank Ignacio Urbano, 54, of Anaheim. Urbano, a former part owner and general manager of Douglas Nissan in Orange, is charged with forgery, grand theft, and other counts in an alleged scheme to defraud banks and customers by artificially driving up the price of used vehicles.
Douglas Nissan remained open while uniformed police officers carted out more than 350 cardboard boxes packed with lease documents, dealer jackets, and loan applications. Potential customers wandered the lots of shiny new Altimas, Pathfinders and Titans. Salesmen patiently answered questions – about the cars – not the investigation. (I could only imagine - AFI)
“The only thing going on here is a big sale. Everyone knows that,” said a man who identified himself as a manager at the dealership, but refused to give his name. Other employees were pulled inside the dealership office when questioned by a small cluster of reporters and television cameras.
Prosecutors believe pilfered pay stubs, driver licenses and social security numbers were used to apply for – and get – fraudulent car loans at Douglas Nissan, said Susan Schroeder, a spokeswoman of the Orange County District Attorney's Office.
“This is something that frightens everyone – that their identity might be stolen and they're left holding the bad credit,” Schroeder said.
The multi-agency investigation – which included representatives of the Department of Motor Vehicles - began about three months ago after complaints of fraudulent loans being processed by the dealership flooded the District Attorney's office.
Anyone who believes they may have been a victim is asked to call the District Attorney's Office at (714)648-3626.
Comments?
More Pictures of Douglas Nissan:
BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 1 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption, Identity Theft
Thursday, January 22, 2009
This was a recent question from my friends at ProfitDrivers.ca in Canada. Does anyone have some feedback?
ProfitDrivers asks:
I am looking for some help! I have been informed by an auto dealer here in BC that a recent Dealer 20 meeting (held in the U.S.) revealed that the F&I office was generating ON AVERAGE $4000-ish per unit - largely due to "consolidation" loans the dealership was managing to get approved (& include?) with a car loan for their customers.
I don't know about you but this really surprises me. Your northern neighbors typically don't see averages in this range. Is this common, the consolidation loan with an auto loan? I thought it was tough enough lately to get a deal approved at all, never mind to include consolidation?! Would this be done through a private financial company?
Any suggestions you can offer are appreciated!
AFI's take on this:
Every F&I Managers dream would be to continually "re-finance" a customers’ auto loan, right after the lender’s finance reserve charge-back period expires of course.
Unfortunately this is prohibited in every dealer agreement with every lender in my dealer group. Because of the obvious cost factor, the lenders don’t want the loans that they might have stretched and done favors for a dealer to be re-financed to a different lender through that dealer.
I have never heard of a dealership actually partnering with a lending source that will let the F&I manager “broker” a home-equity or any kind of consolidation loan and keep the reserve as if the dealerships were mortgage brokers or bankers. I think there are regulations prohibiting such activity.
Some of the ways that this could work is the dealership is “holding the paper” themselves and paying the F&I department a percentage of the reserve taken in – very risky. A dealership probably partnered with a mortgage company (probably hearing about it by hiring a previous employee), to send prospects to that company for consolidation loans in exchange for consideration or the sharing of reserve.
This way it would not violate their dealer agreements with their lenders. The vehicle and additional F&I products would essentially be considered a “cash purchase’. But $4000 F&I profit per unit? With rate mark-ups capped usually by 2 points - and operating in this age of full-disclosure and menu selling, it is pretty tough to AVERAGE $4,000 PRU on the back end.
I am curious about the other business practices of these dealerships.
Comments?
BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com
Remember to Print a copy of this article for your records.
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Ethics, Finance and Insurance, Menu Selling
Sunday, January 4, 2009
The Dangers That a Spot Delivery Brings to a Dealership
The following article does a good job of highlighting the dangers and fraud inherent in the misuse of conditional, or "spot" deliveries.
Spot deliveries: Slippery slope for dealers
By April Wortham, from Automotive News.
Bill Heard Enterprises Inc.'s Chevrolet empire was crumbling. 
Rising fuel prices were gutting the dealer group's high-volume sales of SUVs and pickups.
As showroom traffic at Heard dealerships fell, so did the amount of customers getting into loans, says a former manager at one of the group's two Las Vegas-area stores.
The dealership began targeting what he calls the "credit-challenged customer."
It delivered vehicles to customers on the spot, sometimes at lower interest rates than those for which the customer was likely to qualify.
Handing over the keys before completing the financing is a sales tactic known as spot delivery.
It's a tempting tactic to move the metal in tough times, but as Heard Enterprises learned, it is a risky practice for dealers.
In the last days of the Las Vegas store, the bank rejected a submitted deal about 20 to 30 percent of the time. Some buyers had to return their vehicles.
Others had to re-sign with additional cash down or a higher interest rate. And some were switched into less expensive vehicles that met the bank's lending criteria.
"Those criteria seemed to be ignored a great deal of the time as the pressure was put on the managers to put vehicles on the street," says the manager, who asked not to be identified because he is searching for a new job.
"I think the philosophy was to throw enough stuff against the wall hoping some of it would stick.
As it got closer to the end, less deals were getting bought by the banks."
In September, Heard Enterprises filed for Chapter 11 reorganization, closing all 14 of its Chevrolet dealerships. While the case is extreme, it serves as a warning to dealers who routinely practice spot delivery.
Spot delivery is inherently risky
Done wrong, it can leave a dealer exposed to allegations of predatory lending and to the risk that comes with having millions of dollars in unfinanced inventory roaming the streets.
Yet spot deliveries are tempting for dealers who are trying to sell a car before the customer goes to a rival dealership. That's especially true now, as the number of Americans with tarnished credit grows and one sale can keep a dealership afloat.
There is no way to know for sure how many dealers use spot delivery, but Better Business Bureaus and attorney general offices in several states have fielded consumer complaints about the practice.
"Although the number of dealers spotting cars today has slightly decreased because of tighter lending practices, it is still a necessary evil in the subprime market for the long term," says Raul Vazquez, a dealer consultant and CEO of direct marketing agency Focus Inc.
Vazquez says it takes longer to get loans approved and funded for subprime customers. Yet most customers aren't willing to wait. Rather than watch a customer walk away, most dealers will hand over the keys right then and there, he says.
Dealers who offer spot delivery, he says, must be certain the terms of the sale will stick. "You have to know the lender guidelines. You have to have a sales manager who's watching the deals," Vazquez says. "There are too many guys out there that say, 'Let me put the car out there and maybe I'll get them into a loan.' You just can't do that, because it's too risky for the dealership."
Know the law
Several states regulate spot deliveries, and the rules can vary widely.
Contact your state attorney general's office or department of motor vehicles for details.
Don't leave decisions about when and how to spot-deliver vehicles to a sales manager or F&I manager.
Have a policy in place, and make sure all employees follow it.
Set limits. Auto loans can be approved in 10 days. Anything more than 30 days is asking for trouble. (30 days is freakin' crazy - AFI)
Communicate
Explain to customers that the vehicle purchase isn't final until financing is secured (use a bailment).
Just because they have the keys doesn't mean they own the car.
Put it in writing
Have the customer sign a form that clearly states what spot delivery means. The dealer and the customer also should sign a form stating that if financing cannot be secured the customer is under no obligation to sign another contract.
Deal with it
If a problem arises, tackle it immediately. Don't wait until the customer has gone to the attorney general or a lawyer.
Growing risk
The risk is growing. Almost every lender has tightened its guidelines, especially for subprime loans. Others have abandoned the subprime loan business. That leaves dealers competing for a shrinking pool of money.
On Oct. 28, Myers & Fuller P.A., a Tallahassee, Fla. law firm that specializes in dealer issues, sent a letter to its clients warning them against offering spot deliveries. Doing so, the letter states, could cause them to be considered in breach of contract with their floorplan lender, a situation known as "out of trust."
In essence, once a car leaves the lot, the dealer must repay his source of wholesale financing.
"It is important to understand what the phrase 'out of trust' means when used by a floorplan lender," the letter states. "It may mean that the lender considers any vehicle not in physical inventory on the dealership premises is deemed 'sold' and the lender demands immediate payment (yea...)
"This can occur with dealers who make many sales through spot deliveries and the lender changes the definition of 'sale' in midstream."
GMAC Financial Services LLC, Heard Enterprises' main financing company, denies that it is changing the definitions or rules.
When GMAC provides floorplan financing, the dealer has a window from the time a vehicle leaves the lot until payment is due, says spokesman Mike Stoller.
That window varies from dealer to dealer, but all dealers know exactly what their window is, he says.
It's not a new policy, and the window hasn't suddenly become smaller. But GMAC is "watching its risks" more closely now, Stoller adds.
In other words, dealers who might have gone unnoticed with sloppy spot deliveries in the past are under the microscope now, and GMAC won't hesitate to label them as out of trust.
'Yo-yo financing'
In fact, Stoller says, he wonders why any dealers would risk spot delivering now, unless they were sure that they could get financing.
"We're not outlawing spot delivery. They can do what they need to do to get by," he says. "But it just doesn't strike me as being very wise in this environment."
The current lending climate has exacerbated problems with spot delivery that until now were largely considered consumer issues.
Officials in state attorney general offices tell of dealers calling customers days, weeks, even months later to say that financing fell through.
The customer is usually given a choice: Renegotiate the loan, almost always at less favorable terms, or return the vehicle and pay for any damage or mileage incurred. In many cases the dealership already has sold the customer's trade-in vehicle, leaving the customer with little choice but to sign the new terms.
John van Alst, a lawyer with the National Consumer Law Center in Boston, says that in the cases he has seen, the dealer knew as the customer drove away that financing was unlikely to be approved.
In those cases, he says, the dealer intentionally misled the consumer with the intention of bringing the consumer back later in a disadvantaged position. It's why van Alst and other critics have another name for spot delivery: "yo-yo financing."
"They've already shown their friends and family that they've gotten a new car. And then the dealer brings them back in and forces them to agree to new and worse terms," he says, such as a larger down payment.
Differing opinions
Spot delivery is a necessary selling tool, says Michael Charapp, a Washington dealer lawyer and president of the National Association of Dealer Counsel. Something goes wrong only rarely, he says. Even then, it's usually because the customer made a mistake or lied on the credit application, not because the dealer sought to deceive.
In fact, the loan process is becoming more precise, not less, he says. Services such as DealerTrack and RouteOne allow dealers to submit digital credit applications to a network of lenders and learn almost instantly if a loan will go through.
Rosemary Shahan, president of Consumers for Auto Reliability and Safety in suburban Los Angeles, counters that those instant loan rulings are proof that the vast majority of yo-yo transactions are deliberate.
When dealers had to wait until the bank opened on Monday to fax over a stack of weekend sales contracts, there might have been an excuse, says Shahan. Not now. She says spot delivery is a "huge issue" that hurts dealers as much as consumers.
"It's like the industry is eating its young," she says. Consumers end up in cars they can't afford and take on more debt than they can handle. "People end up being so upside down that you drive them away from the market."
Weak waivers
Keith Whann, a dealer lawyer and former Ohio assistant attorney general, recommends dealers have customers sign what he calls an "acknowledgement of voluntary re-sign." (Bailment)
The form states that the customer understands the deal isn't final and that if financing can't be secured at the agreed-upon terms the buyer is under no obligation to re-sign the contract or purchase the vehicle.
Some dealers are deciding not to chance it. Emanuel Jones, a Georgia dealer who is buying Heard Enterprises' flagship Columbus store, says spot deliveries are part of the sales process. Banks aren't open seven days a week, but his Ford and Toyota stores are.
"However, when the credit market tightens," Jones says, "and you're still doing a lot of spot deliveries, you're going to run into a lot of problems. In my store we had to curtail a lot of spot deliveries for customers we thought were marginal."
Chrissie Thompson contributed to this report
BACK TO THE AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE: http://www.AutoFinanceInsider.blogspot.com
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 3 comments
Labels: Bailments, Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption, Finance and Insurance, Spot Delivery
Tuesday, November 4, 2008
Creative financing
by Gil Van Over
I recently had a conversation with a dealership manager about creative financing.
As sales tighten, some employees are tempted to use shortcuts or whatever means necessary to sell a vehicle.
One such means is to give cash back to the customer in order to seal the deal.
This type of creative financing could put you at risk of having to pay off the deal if the lender finds out about the cash back.
My point
Most lender agreements in place today define the amount financed that the lender is willing to advance as the cost of the vehicle plus tax, title, license, registration fees, doc fees and approved options and F&I products.
Increasing the vehicle cash price (and subsequent amount financed) to include a check to the customer for whatever purpose is a potential violation of the lender agreement.
The manager’s point
The manager was adamant that the lender allowed up to 125% as an advance guideline and he only needed 105% to cover the price of the car and the tax, title and license. Why shouldn’t he be able to give the customer the difference?
It is an interesting concept, but here’s the flaw in his thinking.
The lender’s guideline on advance is to provide the dealership with a maximum structure. It is not permission to take any or every transaction up to the maximum advance to provide customers with a side loan. The lender agreement limits what comprises the advance.
Not bank fraud
However, if the lender knows about the cash back, for whatever reason, and still approved the advance, it is not bank fraud. If you do obtain the lender’s approval to make a side loan, make sure you get it in writing and keep copies of the approval.
Advertising?
As an aside, you may also be running a risk of a deceptive advertising claim if you advertised the vehicle at one price and sold it for a higher price.
Gil Van Over is the President and founder of gvo3 & Associates, a nationally recognized F&I, Sales and Red Flag Rule compliance consulting and training firm (www.gvo3.com).
BACK TO AUTO FINANCE INSIDER HOMEPAGE:
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Compliance, Deceptive Advertising, Gil Van Over
Friday, October 10, 2008
Suspicious activity reports
by Gil Van Over
Last year many economists, including some from NADA, were predicting that the subprime mortgage crisis would not affect the auto industry because mortgages are different from auto loans.
Balderdash I said. They may be two different lending instruments, but they are both originated from the same customer base.
I bring this up because I have been writing about Suspicious Activity Reports (SAR) for over two years now.
Now comes a news report that the FBI is assembling a task force to investigate the substantial increase in Suspicious Activity Reports in the mortgage industry. Can the car industry be far behind?
Suspicious Activity Report
As a refresher, a federally insured institution must file a SAR whenever it suspects bank fraud. This means that whenever a fraudulent deal is uncovered by a bank, credit union or other federally insured institutions, this entity is submitting a report to the Department of Treasury providing the details of the fraud.
In the car business, any deal that is considered a straw purchase, or is power booked, or has falsified income, or discloses a non-existent down payment is considered fraud and the institution will file a SAR.
Mortgages First, Car Loans Next
Just like the subprime crisis has affected subprime customers the ability to obtain a mortgage, subprime customers are now finding it difficult to obtain auto loans.
Likewise the mortgage industry is going to incur the Fed’s wrath based on an escalating filing of SARs and the car industry may not be far behind.
If you aren’t submitting straw purchases or power booking used cars or jacking up customer’s incomes or creating phony down payments, you don’t have anything to worry about.
If, however, you are…you do.
Gil Van Over is the President and founder of gvo3 & Associates, a nationally recognized F&I, Sales and Red Flag Rule compliance consulting and training firm (www.gvo3.com).
Link to Original Article:
Thanks for another fantastic article Gil!
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Compliance, Finance and Insurance, Gil Van Over
Friday, September 12, 2008
Capital One survey: Americans don't know loan rates
"A majority (61 percent) of Americans who currently have auto loans do not know the interest rate they are paying on their loan, a new survey from Capital One Financial Corporation suggests. In a challenging economy, when saving money is particularly important, many consumers may be paying more than necessary and could benefit from a lower interest rate and a lower monthly loan payment by refinancing, the company notes..."
Read the rest of the article here.
Are you kidding me???
Where is Capital One getting the data for this survey?
I get beat up all the time over the interest rates. The majority of my customers want to know, and my procedure manual dictates, a full disclosure of exactly what the interest rate will be before any F&I products are mentioned.
Does this article imply that if the customer falls into the sub-prime catagory, the F&I manager might not be practicing proper disclosure? By reading this article, it appears so at least 61% of the time - right?
Would Capital One be admitting that they are buying paper from automotive dealerships who are not properly disclosing what their customers are signing?
Having a 61% portfolio ratio of customers who have no idea what their interest rate is would scare me to death.
This creates visions of an F&I Manager putting one hand over the truith-in-lending disclosures while at the same time pointing toward the bottom of the r.i.s.c. while leading the customer to just "sign right here".
Are we heading back to the "good 'ol days"?
Scary.
Back to blog homepage
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 3 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Compliance, Finance and Insurance
Thursday, July 17, 2008
NY car dealer hit with $150K fine for bait-and-switch promotion
Customers thought they had won valuable prizes until they read the fine print
The New York Attorney General wants a car dealer to pay customers for persistently using misleading promotions intended to lure them into the dealership. The customers, once inside the dealership, were also subject to other fraudulent and unfair sales practices, according to Consumer Affairs.com and the North Country Gazette.
Five Towns Mitsubishi must pay $115,000 in restitution to consumers and $35,000 in penalties and costs to the state.
The authorities received more than 50 complaints regarding the dealership’s business practices.
Five Towns was charged with mailing advertisements to thousands of consumers featuring a scratch-off ticket called Dash-for-Cash in which a consumer could win a cash prize, a free vehicle, a vacation, a free gas voucher or a $1,000 shopping spree. A winning ticket contained 3 like symbols in a row but it did not explain, what, if anything, the consumer won. Instead, they had to bring the ticket to the dealership in order to claim the prize.
Once at the dealership, customers found that nearly all of them had won the vacation or $1,000 shopping spree. However, the vacation and shopping spree prizes had minimal value due to either blackout periods or expenditure requirements, including shipping and handling costs.
In addition, the dealership was charged with:
–Obtaining signatures on contracts and finance agreements when customers mistakenly believed that they were filling out paperwork for vehicles they had won as part of the Dash for the Cash sweepstakes
–Offering false discounts off the sale price of a vehicle by selling it at a higher retail sale price, which essentially nullified the value of the discount offered
–Having customers sign documents with blank sections for figures and terms, and then later filling them out with terms that were not agreed upon
–Promising consumers that they could refinance at a better interest rate after making several car payments, or promising to pay one or more months of the insurance payments for the vehicle – and then reneging on those agreements
–Inserting additional cost items without consumers’ knowledge or consent, including VIN etching, service warranties, theft deterrent systems, GPS devices and other options.
Wow.
AFI's take on this:
I was just thinking about how else could you sell a Mitsubishi (bad thoughts), and was reminded of Gill Van Over's latest article in Dealer Magazine: Outside Sales Commit Inside Jobs. (June '08). It is about the compliance issues associated with hiring outside sales promotion companies.
Yes it seems that this dealership has a huge ethics issue. I wonder how the F&I department is run - signing bank contracts when they thought they were getting a free vehicle and packing all the back end products on top of that. No wonder car dealers seem to be thought of as no better than pond scum with stories like this continuing to break.
Shouldn't the vendor who supplied the scratch - off tickets bear some of the responsibility? Gil said in the article: "Like it or not, transgressions are your responsibility. It is your dealership; you simply are using contractors, not employees".
Sends shivers up my spine.
Back to blog homepage
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Compliance, Dealership Corruption, Gil Van Over
Friday, June 13, 2008
Car Salesman accused of stealing 33 identities
Shawn Lee McDonald was charged with grand theft and fraudulent use of personal information according to Crestview, Florida police and as reported in the Northwest Florida Daily News. He reportedly initiated 73 credit applications and received 20 credit cards. Link to source article:
McDonald sold his dealership's customer, Jim Dohse a Chevrolet HHR back in March. Allegedly while completing the transaction, McDonald stole Dohse’s personal information and started to make credit applications using his identity. When he was applying for credit, McDonald used the victim’s name and then requested a second card be issued where he was an authorized user.
What tripped up this ID theft scam quickly was that Dohse had invested in LifeLock,a credit monitoring service that notified him every time someone applied for credit in his name. It was not long after the car purchase that a wave of credit applications were made in his name. This, of course, prompted him to contact the local police.
So far, McDonald is being accused of stealing 33 identities of dealership customers of Hub City Ford from which he made at least 73 credit applications, netting him 20 fraudulent credit cards. The police have identified charges to those accounts totaling nearly $8,000 from Overstock.com, almost $7,000 at a Marriott in Fairfield, California (must have been some vacation!) and even nearly $3,000 toward restitution at the Mobile County, Alabama district attorney’s office. Can anyone spell “background check?”
McDonald is also listed as President of a company called Premier Brokers, Inc. and courtesy checks drawn on some of the fraudulently acquired credit card accounts totaling $7,000 were also issued. We can only guess the nature of this company’s business activity, but it is interesting to note that McDonald even used the fraudulently acquired credit cards to order business cards for the venture..
LifeLock Identity Theft Prevention is credited with uncovering the ongoing and extensive scam.
The Crestview Police are asking anyone who thinks they might be another victim of identity theft in this case to come forward by calling 682-4157.
Throw the book at him.
AFI
Back to blog homepage
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption, Identity Theft
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Former Honda store GM pleads guilty to fraud charges in leasing case
My objective when I display content within this blog is to promote the federal laws and regulations that will help you to understand the operations of a compliant f&i department. There is much to learn from lawbreakers who get caught. AFI
U.S. Attorney pursues dealership manager over altered lease documents
Duane Clark, the former general manager of Chezik Honda in Kansas City, Mo., pleaded guilty in federal court to a wire fraud scheme that involved falsifying paperwork on car leases in order to obtain higher commissions for himself, according to a release from the U.S. Department of Justice.
READ THE REST OF THE ARTICLE:
http://www.AFItoday.blogspot.com
Back to blog homepage
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Bank Fraud, Dealership Corruption
Saturday, March 22, 2008
Top Compliance Concerns for 2008
Top Compliance Concerns for 2008
by : Gil Van Over
There are risks, and there are risks. If you are late to an important appointment, meeting or date, you balance the risk of exceeding the speed limit and making the meeting on time versus the risk of obeying the law and potentially losing face if you are late.
If you are trying to reduce your belt size, you balance the risk of adding pounds versus the pleasure of a Reuben sandwich with cottage fries at lunch.
If you are a movie star or a recording artist, you run the risk of losing your audience when you use your star status to forward an unpopular opinion or belief or religion.
A dealership faces risk every day in every part of the business. The smart dealers understand that they must have the information available to understand how to manage these risks. Here is some information…
Higher risks
There are innumerable risks in a dealership’s sales and F&I processes. Some are pretty low risks, while others are a relatively higher risk. Here is my list of the higher risk areas a dealership faces in 2008:
• Identity theft
• Packing payments
• Forging signatures
• Falsifying income
• Power booking
• Straw purchases
• Sub-prime acquisition fees
• Forms execution
• Adverse action notification
• Rebate administration
One at a time:
Identity theft – The bad guys are out there and they ain’t going away. Many people are focused on the meth heads that use ID theft as a way to fuel their habit. However, many of the articles flowing through the Internet now uncover the ID thieves as employees at dealerships and banks. Make sure that you have a solid Safeguards program in place, including periodic audits and training. Keep a vigilant eye on those employees that have access to consumer’s non-public, personal information. Finally, ramp up your organization to embrace the Red Flags Rule requirements. You should have already started to develop and implement the program with a drop dead date of November 1.
Packing payments – This potentially deceptive practice is specifically illegal in California and other states are looking to pass similar statutes. The dark side opines that a consumer has the right to know the right payment amount for the item being negotiated at any point in the negotiations. The judges and juries tend to agree with this notion. With the number of desking systems now available to dealerships, payment packing should become as ancient as 8-track technology, but it still makes occasional appearances. You should implement a process that prohibits payment packing, whether you use a desking system or a sharpie.
Forging signatures – Logic dictates that this criminal offense should not be on this list because it should not even be a course of action any reasonable person would take. Think again. Perhaps out of laziness, perhaps out of oversight, perhaps out of brazenness, forgeries are happening every day at dealerships. Most of the time it is not on a contract or an enrollment form. Most of the time it is on a menu or an odometer statement or a rebate form. Regardless of the document, any signature not affixed by the consumer is a forgery. You must make it a policy that forgers will be fired and follow up if you find a forgery.
Falsifying income – This is bank fraud. Let me repeat, bank fraud. If the bank or credit union catches you, they will report you to the Feds using a form called a Suspicious Activity Report. I don’t know about you, but I shudder to think that my name is associated with a suspicious report on file with the government. A few dealers have had enough SARs filed against them that the banking regulators turned the case over to the FBI, who investigated and raided and still retains the files. You can help avoid the FBI raids by diligently monitoring credit application information. Look for strikeovers on credit applications, or an inordinate amount of Social Security income as additional income. Have your IT people run a scan on your systems looking for paystub templates or Social Security award letter templates. Review a sampling of deals and compare the income in the file to the income listed in Route One, Dealer Track or CUDL transmissions.
Power booking – Bank fraud II. Like falsifying income, dealers found guilty of power booking deals will have an SAR filed against the dealer. Same scenario as above. Too many SARs and the FBI comes calling. Set up a process where a manager is required to sign and date every bookout sheet that leaves the dealership. That person is responsible to accurately represent the vehicle’s options and miles. If the manager lies to the bank, the manager is looking for a job somewhere else.
Straw purchases – Bank fraud déjà vu. Straw purchases generate SARs. Straws are also specifically against the Texas state statutes. You need to establish a policy that straws are not acceptable and enforce the policy.
Sub-prime acquisition fees – With the current focus on sub-prime lending, regulators, politicians and opportunistic plaintiff’s lawyers will put a magnifying glass on sub-prime transactions. Add to the mix that the vast majority of consumer lawsuits against dealers that I have worked on as an expert witness involve a sub-prime customer as the plaintiff. If you have a process that increases the price of a vehicle to accommodate a sub-prime acquisition fee, you are running the risk of a Truth in Lending based lawsuit. You must take the sub-prime acquisition fee as a cost of goods sold.
Forms execution – As simple as it sounds, it appears to be just as difficult in execution. The forms used to close a deal are pre-printed. The computers used to complete the forms can be programmed to properly fill in the blanks. Some dealers just don’t get it and fill them out incorrectly. The lenders continue to accept the deals instead of kicking them. Now, plaintiffs’ attorneys are using this as evidence that the dealership intended to confuse the consumer, thus committing fraud. Have your F&I manager print a sample retail and lease deal. Make sure everything is printing where it is supposed to.
Adverse action notification – This issue is likely the most confusing one that a dealer faces. Should I or shouldn’t I? Unfortunately, like those old commercials, we don’t have a hairdresser with the magic answer. Some plaintiffs’ attorneys are funding their retirement incomes on this single issue. The NADA provided direction late last year with a management guide. You should review the guide with your attorney and decide what you need to do.
Rebate administration – Some manufacturers apparently consider rebate audits as an income center. I have heard of seven-figure chargebacks at single point stores. You should consider conducting your own periodic audits to ensure that you don’t owe the factory any more money.
Gil Van Over is the president and founder of gvo3 & Associates, a national compliance consulting firm that specializes in F&I and sales compliance and training.
Link to Dealer Magazine Article
LUCKY EBAY SEARCH BOX
Visit AutoFinanceInsider.com
Posted by Auto Finance Insider (AFI) 0 comments
Labels: Adverse Action Notices, Bank Fraud, Compliance, Gil Van Over, Identity Theft, Red Flags Rule, Spot Delivery, The Way it Should Be Done

